I’ve done a quick crunch of the numbers provided by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) in its FOIA grant. There’s nowhere but up for this court, and Ms. Grundmann was smart to have released earlier statistics so that we can all observe as MSPB works to shed its reputation as one of the most arbitrary administrative courts in America.
The following is a rundown by regional office for the period from October 2007 through September 2008. New York, with a 0.6% rate of success for employee appellants, wins the “tell me again, why do you exist?” award while Dallas and San Francisco win the award for “most hostile,” turning in affirmations in favor of the agency at a rate of 16.7% and 15.6% respectively. The bottom line is this: In FY 2008, non-benefit* MSPB initial dockets had a rate of 1.7% success in favor of the appellant.
FISCAL YEAR STATISTICS FOR 2008 ALL NON-BENEFIT MSPB INITIAL DOCKETS BY REGIONAL OFFICE AND DISPOSITION* TOTAL CASELOAD = 4698 ALL REGIONAL OFFICES 4698 100.0% FOR AGENCY 570 12.1% DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 2208 47.0% DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 545 11.6% FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT 79 1.7% SETTLED 1296 27.6% ATLANTA 779 100.0% FOR AGENCY 101 13.0% DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 382 49.0% DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 58 7.4% FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT 20 2.6% SETTLED 218 28.0% CHICAGO 635 100.0% FOR AGENCY 72 11.3% DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 276 43.5% DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 82 12.9% FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT 7 1.1% SETTLED 198 31.2% DALLAS 557 100.0% FOR AGENCY 93 16.7% DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 247 44.3% DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 74 13.3% FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT 8 1.4% SETTLED 135 24.2% DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 760 100.0% FOR AGENCY 93 12.2% DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 387 50.9% DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 76 10.0% FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT 9 1.2% SETTLED 195 25.7% DENVER 453 100.0% FOR AGENCY 46 10.2% DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 165 36.4% DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 66 14.6% FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT 15 3.3% SETTLED 161 35.5% NEW YORK 315 100.0% FOR AGENCY 13 4.1% DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 175 55.6% DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 39 12.4% FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT 2 0.6% SETTLED 86 27.3% PHILADELPHIA 539 100.0% FOR AGENCY 49 9.1% DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 273 50.6% DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 65 12.1% FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT 6 1.1% SETTLED 146 27.1% SAN FRANCISCO 660 100.0% FOR AGENCY 103 15.6% DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 303 45.9% DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE 85 12.9% FOR EMPLOYEE APPELLANT 12 1.8% SETTLED 157 23.8%
* EXCLUDES CSRA BENEFIT, FERS AND FERCCA -TYPE CLAIMS
3 users commented in " FY 2008: LESS than a two percent chance of prevailing at MSPB "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackThere are incredible statistics…why can’t people wake up and see the truth! I will write to my Congressmen as much as I can until they take a look at the MSPB.
Big business control MSPB and Federal Government.
The Merit System Protection Board has been biased long before 2008. In 1988, I had a proceeding before the MSPB San Francisco and the administrative law judge (ALJ) went on vacation for 30 days (or 20 days) and eliminated one solid month out of the four month adjudication process. The case was out-of-hand dismissed. Initial decisions by the ALJ are not published and not readily available for public inspection. The FINAL DECISIONS (maybe 1/3) of the actual BOARD are made available for the public’s review through a law library or download. What this means in practice is that corrupt decisions or dismissal of cases for a false reason CAN BE HIDDEN FROM PUBLIC VIEW–because the initial decision is only known to the aggrieved ex-federal employee or federal employee. In other words, the de facto secrecy of the ALJ initial decision allows for all kinds of injustice that the public will never find out about. Of course, the MSPB will argue, you can appeal… you can appeal to a higher authority. This may be true, but people without jobs have limited resources and can only prosecute a case for so long before the need to expend limited resources to look for another job. You cannot spend your life fighting a Federal agency–efforts have to count–such as the initial decision of the ALJ. The United States Congress need to reform the MSPB to make all of it’s decisions (including the initial decision of the ALJ) public. Everything needs to be published on-line and in all law libraries everywhere in the world. Right now, the MSPB effectively hides the initial decision of the Administrative Law Judge. Even the FINAL decisions are not that well known to the general public. The MSPB is an obscure and little known Federal agency. jans123z@gmx.net
Leave A Reply