<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boeing Whistleblower Gerald Eastman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://civilservicechange.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://civilservicechange.org/?p=317</link>
	<description>Because Democracy is Not Free -- we all have to work at it</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:01:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Eastman</title>
		<link>http://civilservicechange.org/?p=317&#038;cpage=1#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Eastman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 04:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedhallofshame.com/?p=317#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Charlotte, for covering this on your blog. Thanks also users, for the kind comments. True, I do need more legal help than I currently have. I recognized early on this was a RICCO-like case. It is crime organized to the nth degree. My being prosecuted for breaking an anti-computer hacker law when I didn&#039;t hack into any computer is just a case of the true criminals going on legal offense so they can continue their fraud by making an example of the one person who did the most to try to end it. If I could be convicted of a crime I did not commit, that surely would deter any would-be whistleblower, no matter how law abiding they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Charlotte, for covering this on your blog. Thanks also users, for the kind comments. True, I do need more legal help than I currently have. I recognized early on this was a RICCO-like case. It is crime organized to the nth degree. My being prosecuted for breaking an anti-computer hacker law when I didn&#8217;t hack into any computer is just a case of the true criminals going on legal offense so they can continue their fraud by making an example of the one person who did the most to try to end it. If I could be convicted of a crime I did not commit, that surely would deter any would-be whistleblower, no matter how law abiding they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Government Accountability Project: Whistleblower, Gerald Eastman &#171; Whistleblower Support Blog</title>
		<link>http://civilservicechange.org/?p=317&#038;cpage=1#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Government Accountability Project: Whistleblower, Gerald Eastman &#171; Whistleblower Support Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedhallofshame.com/?p=317#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>[...] Boeing Whistleblower Gerald Eastman [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Boeing Whistleblower Gerald Eastman [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. F. Scott</title>
		<link>http://civilservicechange.org/?p=317&#038;cpage=1#comment-1004</link>
		<dc:creator>G. F. Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 02:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedhallofshame.com/?p=317#comment-1004</guid>
		<description>This whole case has been a disgrace to the legal system and an embarrasment to all who seek justice.  The company has been trying to blame many things on the convenient fall guy.  All the while they continue their too cozy relationships with many individuals and offices in the government.  

Boeing has tried very hard to paint Mr. Eastman as a common criminal, and deny him the dignity of being acknowledged as a legitimate whistleblower, which he is.  It appears they may have been successful in buying themselves influence in the prosecutor&#039;s office through campaign contributions, and they successfully convinced a judge to instruct the jury to ignore whistleblower law in considering the case during the last trial.  One can only wonder what they&#039;ve been cooking up for the second one.  

Boeing apparently feels they must make a very big example of Mr. Eastman in order to intimidate and terrorize the rest of their employees.  I expect they fear what other employees might be able to tell if they decided to become whistleblowers.  In the mean time, I am advised, working conditions continue to deteriorate and the atmosphere becomes more hostile for their employees.  

Boeing attends court dates with a stable of attorneys, both in-house and some outside hired guns, I am told.  All of this to try to destroy one whistleblower, who has only his one court appointed defender to fight back.  If anyone knows of more help for Mr. Eastman, please let him know.  Email at his website:  www.thelastinspector.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole case has been a disgrace to the legal system and an embarrasment to all who seek justice.  The company has been trying to blame many things on the convenient fall guy.  All the while they continue their too cozy relationships with many individuals and offices in the government.  </p>
<p>Boeing has tried very hard to paint Mr. Eastman as a common criminal, and deny him the dignity of being acknowledged as a legitimate whistleblower, which he is.  It appears they may have been successful in buying themselves influence in the prosecutor&#8217;s office through campaign contributions, and they successfully convinced a judge to instruct the jury to ignore whistleblower law in considering the case during the last trial.  One can only wonder what they&#8217;ve been cooking up for the second one.  </p>
<p>Boeing apparently feels they must make a very big example of Mr. Eastman in order to intimidate and terrorize the rest of their employees.  I expect they fear what other employees might be able to tell if they decided to become whistleblowers.  In the mean time, I am advised, working conditions continue to deteriorate and the atmosphere becomes more hostile for their employees.  </p>
<p>Boeing attends court dates with a stable of attorneys, both in-house and some outside hired guns, I am told.  All of this to try to destroy one whistleblower, who has only his one court appointed defender to fight back.  If anyone knows of more help for Mr. Eastman, please let him know.  Email at his website:  <a href="http://www.thelastinspector.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thelastinspector.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://civilservicechange.org/?p=317&#038;cpage=1#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedhallofshame.com/?p=317#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>It won&#039;t happen.  Once Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas, they eliminated the competition.  Besides, where would all those SESers and Generals go to work after retiring from Govt. service?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t happen.  Once Boeing bought McDonnell Douglas, they eliminated the competition.  Besides, where would all those SESers and Generals go to work after retiring from Govt. service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RLK</title>
		<link>http://civilservicechange.org/?p=317&#038;cpage=1#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>RLK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fedhallofshame.com/?p=317#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>Boeing is a criminal enterprise;

RICCO Act–”When three or more parties conspire to carry on an on going criminal enterprise, it can fall under the “RICCO Act. 

Boeing should be barred from Gov&#039;t contracts for a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boeing is a criminal enterprise;</p>
<p>RICCO Act–”When three or more parties conspire to carry on an on going criminal enterprise, it can fall under the “RICCO Act. </p>
<p>Boeing should be barred from Gov&#8217;t contracts for a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
